Dear các bạn,

Thanks, Thai Ha, again for the very good translation of yesterday’s challenge. I have planned not to have an English challenge for Saturday, but chị Kiêm Yến seems to want to keep it going. So I have it here, in case you would like some work over the weekend.

Thai Ha’s translation is very good. Not much to fix. But here are some minor points:

“A widely anticipated speech” should be translated as “một bài phát biểu nhiều người đang chờ đợi.”

“yet issued a firm, evenhanded call to the Jewish state and Palestinians alike” should be translated as “tuy nhiên vẫn kêu gọi, cứng rắn và công bằng, cả nước Do Thái lẫn người Palestine …”

“a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations” should be translated as “Chiến tranh Lạnh trong đó các quốc gia có đa số dân là Hồi giáo thường bị dùng như những con chốt trong khi nguyện vọng của họ không hề được quan tâm.”

Thanks again, Thai Ha.
.

TODAY’S CHALLENGE

This a CNN news piece about Palin’s criticism of Obama’s policy. She talked in a conversational tone. So there are many typical conversational words here for you to get yourselves familiar with.

Palin blasts Obama administration: Government wants to “control the people”

(CNN) – Alaska governor Sarah Palin let loose Wednesday on the Obama administration for enacting fiscal policies that “fly in the face of principles” and “defy Economics 101.”

In a speech introducing Michael Reagan — the son of former President Ronald Reagan — to an audience in Anchorage, Palin warned that the government is planning to “bail out debt ridden states” so it can “get in there and control the people.”

“Since when can you get out of huge national debt by creating trillions of dollars of new debt?” Palin asked. “It all really is so backwards and skewed as to sound like absolute nonsense when some of this economic policy is explained.”

“We need to be aware of the creation of a fearful population, and fearful lawmakers, being led to believe that big government is the answer, to bail out the private sector, because then government gets to get in there and control it,” she said. “And mark my words, this is going to be next, I fear, bail out next debt-ridden states. Then government gets to get in there and control the people.”

“Some in Washington would approach our economic woes in ways that absolutely defy Economics 101, and they fly in the face of principles, providing opportunity for industrious Americans to succeed or to fail on their own accord,” she said. “Those principles it makes you wonder what the heck some in Washington are trying to accomplish here.”

Though the bulk of her remarks focused on government encroachment into the private sector, and praise for former President Reagan’s views on limited government, the former vice presidential candidate briefly touched on national security. She told the crowd that “the terrorists are still dead set against us” and that her son Track is still deployed in Iraq.

“It is war over there, so it will not be war over here,” she said. “And it had better still be our mission that we win, they lose.”

Vocabulary notes:

“Economics 101” is the name of the lowest economics class in university.

“What the heck” is a nice swearing term (chửi thề). Originally, it is “What the hell.” What the hell did you give me in this box? (Anh cho em cái quái quỷ gì trong hộp này?). People say “what the hell” is a bad swearing term, so they change the sound to “what the heck.”

That’s it. Have fun, everyone. Have a great great great weekend. 🙂

Hoành

Hi everyone,

Let’s continue the discussion on our future plan. Since no one seems to contradict me on my last message, I think we can come to some compromise for the time being, to see how it goes.

I think we can just make one page called “Discussion In English” and put the Daily English Challenge as a section of that page. In that way, we still have the challenge and talk about English a bit each day, but we can be sure that the “challenge” will have the overall effect of the “English only” method we use in the “discussion” page. And we can make the challenge at the entry and intermediate levels. Advanced people don’t need it.

But I need someone to help me handle that section. Any volunteer? If there is no volunteer, I will ask chị Huệ if we can invite some English teacher(s) who is/are willing to help.

Thanks a million in advance.

YESTERDAY’S CHALLENGE

Thank you very much, Thai Ha, for answering. That is a good translation, nothing to fix.

I need to go over Psalm 23 again to emphasize some important writing techniques. This Psalm was written almost 3 thousand years ago, but it is still the standard for today’s writing. That is why it is so famous.

Let’s look at it again:

The LORD is my shepherd, I shall not be in want.

He makes me lie down in green pastures,
he leads me beside quiet waters,
he restores my soul.

He guides me in paths of righteousness
for his name’s sake.

Even though I walk
through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil,
for you are with me;
your rod and your staff,
they comfort me.

You prepare a table before me
in the presence of my enemies.
You anoint my head with oil;
my cup overflows.

Surely goodness and love will follow me
all the days of my life,
and I will dwell in the house of the LORD
forever.

1. Simple words. There is no complex word in this poem. The entire poem has only one 3-syllable word “righteousness” and, even that, this is a very well-known word–everyone is familiar with it.

2. Concrete words and ideas.

* the Lord is my shepherd. (Not, the Lord is my creator).

* I shall not be in want. (Not, I shall not be poor).

* He makes me lie down in green pastures. (Not, he gives me good rest).

* He leads me besides quiet waters. (Not, he gives my security and peace).

* He restores my soul (“My soul” happens to be an abstract word, but the sentence tries to make it concrete by using the word “restores”, like restoring a broken house).

* He guides me in paths of righteousness (Again, “righteousness” happens to be an abstract word, but the word “paths” helps make it concrete.

* Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death (Not, even though I am in trouble).

* I will fear no evil. (This clause is intentionally left abstract, to weaken the sense of “evil”).

* For you are with me. (Not, for you always care about me).

* Your rod and your staff, they comfort me. (Not, you give me protection and give me peace).

* You prepare a table before me, in the presence of my enemy. (Not, you give me courage and calmness when I am under attack).

* You anoint my head with oil. (Not, you make me your chosen one).

* My cup overflows. (Not, you give me more than I need).

* Surely goodness and love will follow me all the days of my life. (“Goodness” and “love” are abstract words made concrete by the term “follow”).

* And I will dwell in the house of the Lord forever. (Not, I will dwell in heaven forever).

3. Short, simple, clear sentences. Ex: The lord is my shepherd, I shall not be in want.

4. Present tense. Ex: Your rod and your staff, they comfort me.

5. Indicative mood, active voice. Ex: He makes me lie down in green pastures.

5. Using images and pictures. We can see that the entire poem is all images and pictures.

These are standards of writing, brothers and sisters. Keep these in mind. Kalil Gibran took these standards to the utmost, by concreting every single abstract idea.

TODAY’S CHALLENGE

OK, here is today’s challenge, everyone.

Please translate the following news article into Vietnamese.

Obama Reaches Out to Muslim World
By MARK S. SMITH

CAIRO (June 4) — Quoting from the Quran for emphasis, President Barack Obama called for a “new beginning between the United States and Muslims” Thursday and said together, they could confront violent extremism across the globe and advance the timeless search for peace in the Middle East.

“This cycle of suspicion and discord must end,” Obama said in a widely anticipated speech in one of the world’s largest Muslim countries, an address designed to reframe relations after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and the U.S.-led war in Iraq.

The White House said Obama’s speech contained no new policy proposals on the Middle East. He said American ties with Israel are unbreakable, yet issued a firm, evenhanded call to the Jewish state and Palestinians alike to live up to their international obligations.
In a gesture to the Islamic world, Obama conceded at the beginning of his remarks that tension “has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations.”

Have fun. Thank you, everyone.

Have a great day!

Hoành

Hi Everyone,

Thanks chị Yến, Truong and Kitty for the notes. The idea of breaking the daily challenge into smaller parts for different groups and doing two pages each day–one for discussion on national affairs and one for English challenge–is good.

But here is my thinking:

I am thinking that we need to go into the “English only” mode. In the discussions (in English) we may be able to achieve the English training naturally, simply by discussing things. That is the best way to learn English. You learn “live” English, which is absorbed naturally, just by living it. And EVERYONE can be involved in the discussions.

The daily challenge has some obstacles to “live” English–relying too much on translation, “dictionary English”, and Vietnamese as the bridge, which keeps the mind stuck on Vietnamese grammatical logic. And it seems I have not been able to break out of this operating mode and move into the English-only mode. I am thinking that this may become a detriment rather than help.

In addition, we can’t create more activities without additional help. Do we have one or two English teachers willing to work with me on the Daily English Challenge?

TODAY’S CHALLENGE

OK, while we are discussing on this, let’s continue our daily challenge until we have come to a final conclusion.

Below is a very famous poem called Psalm 23, a Psalm of David. It is from the Bible. I have explained earlier why I keep giving you Bible excerpts.

David was a farmer boy and he played music. I think he played the little harp. He killed the giant Goliath in a battle and later became the greatest king of Israel. He wrote a lot of songs and they are the Psalms in the Bible.

The Psalms contain very beautiful English. They are simple and picturesque, and have very high emotional impact. Psalms are among the most beautiful poems in human literature. Abraham Lincoln learned beautiful language for his famous speeches from the Psalms. His mother used the Bible to teach him English. I read the Psalms to learn the power of beautiful simple English. Many friends have asked me: “How to learn to write English beautifully?” and I have answered: “Read the Psalms, even if you are not Christian.” I used to read many books just to learn English. I used to rank Kalil Gibran top on my list, until I studied the Psalms–I dropped Kalil Gibran.

Psalm 23 is the most famous Psalm. If you watch movies, when soldiers are under heavy enemy pressure, they may read Psalm 23.

Here it is. Please translate Psalm 23 below into English.

The LORD is my shepherd, I shall not be in want.

Surely goodness and love will follow me
all the days of my life,
and I will dwell in the house of the LORD
forever.

Have a wonderful day.

Hoanh

Hi everyone,

2 billion people in the world are learning English, and the country with the highest number of English students is China. In the following video Jay Walker talks about the “English Mania” worldwide, especially in China.

According to Walker, English is the language of problem solving and opportunity.
.

I would like to turn this Daily English Challenge into a page of English discussion on the issues of the nation. But it should be different from VNBIZ, which is an existing English forum on national issues.

* The discussions should have only positive tone on dotchuoinon. We want everything to be positive here. It means, we discuss issues to solve issues, not to attack anyone or any agency.

* We want the language to be simple, so that students can participate.

* We want participants to understand very clearly that we all are doing this to figure out and test various communication methods that may be applicable in revolutionizing our English teaching methodology.

I am very confident that after a while we will come up with so many different methods and teaching aids. Trust me.

Please tell me what you think.

Great day, brothers and sisters.

Hoanh

Hi everyone,

Here are my temporary conclusions, after more than a month of searching and experimenting, about our English issues:

1. There is a wide gap between reading comprehension and writing skills.
2. This is a wide gap between translating English into Vietnamese and translating from Vietnamese into English.
3. Even people with very high level of writing–translators for newspapers- are stuck with “translated English” and sound awkward.
4. There is considerable difficulty in writing English directly, without the help of a Vietnamese article for translation purposes.
5. There is a weakness in familiarity with everyday English.
6. I also suspect a weakness in multiple choice testing.

I think the main reason is that Vietnamese language has been playing a major role in English teaching. I think Vietnamese language should play NO role in English hours. Everyone should stay with only one language in the English hour–English language.

In English hours, students should be taught to speak, listen, read and write English, without the interference of Vietnamese language.

In other words, we need the “total submersion” method in English education.

And I think we can do that easily, simply by switching methodology. The current teachers can do that. Immediately. Without the need for bureaucracy, plans, calculations, approvals, etc. We just need a group of dedicated teachers.

I would like to hear more from English teachers on these points. And eventually we should have a group of teachers with the same thinking, to explore ways to revolutionize English teaching. Let’s focus on our creative power.

And we need to think about more methods for students to use English in everyday life, more than just a couple of hours a week in the classroom.

We need to think about English as a major component of the national development strategy. As a nation, we need to master English as the main business language, at the same level as Vietnamese business language. The world is a very large reservoir of knowledge, and English is the conduit into that reservoir. We cannot afford to be weak.

Let’s keep all these points in mind as we explore our ways together.

TODAY’S CHALLENGE

I am thinking about eventually turning these challenges into discussions, so that we can simply “talk” in English, about issues of our lives, our cities and our nation. But I am not sure how to go about it yet. Still thinking. If you have any suggestion, please shoot.

In the meantime, here is our challenge for today:

Chị Kiêm Yến posted this quote by Demosthenes on May 29: “Small opportunities are often the beginning of great enterprises.”

Please explain it to him.

Have a great time.

Hoanh